The Pinel scheme took its final bow on 31 December 2024. After nine years of existence and billions of euros in tax reductions distributed, the overall assessment is mixed at the national level and frankly disappointing for Paris. Investors who purchased new-build properties in zone A bis hoping to combine tax relief with wealth building often find themselves with overpriced properties, rents capped below market rates, and a real yield that struggles to outperform a regulated savings account.
This is not an ideological indictment of tax relief. It is a factual assessment that we at Home Select have drawn up after supporting investors for fifteen years, including some who came to us specifically to exit a poorly calibrated Pinel investment and reinvest in a better-performing property.
Pinel in summary: a mechanism designed for the provinces
The Pinel scheme offered a tax reduction proportional to the duration of the rental commitment in new-build properties. The final rates in force (standard Pinel version, excluding Pinel+) were 9% of the purchase price for a 6-year commitment, 12% for 9 years and 14% for 12 years. The eligible investment ceiling was set at 300,000 euros and 5,500 euros/m², a ceiling that Parisian prices easily exceeded.
In Paris (zone A bis), rents were capped at 18.25 euros/m² in 2024. For a two-bedroom flat of 40 m², the maximum authorised rent was 730 euros/month. Yet the market rent for a furnished two-bedroom flat of 40 m² in a new building in Paris is around 1,400-1,600 euros/month in 2026. The Pinel cap imposed a shortfall of 670 to 870 euros/month, or 8,000 to 10,400 euros/year in revenue sacrificed on the altar of tax reduction.
The mechanism worked better in medium-sized provincial cities (zones B1 and B2), where the gap between Pinel rent and market rent was smaller, or even zero. In Paris, this gap made the scheme structurally unfavourable compared to a standard investment.
Full simulation: Pinel in Paris versus older property under LMNP
The figures lay bare the scale of the problem. An investor buys in 2022 a new-build two-bedroom flat of 40 m² in the 13th arrondissement, in a Pinel programme marketed at 13,500 euros/m². The total price is 540,000 euros. The Pinel ceiling of 300,000 euros means only this amount qualifies for the tax reduction: the remaining 240,000 euros generate no tax advantage. The commitment is for 9 years.
The tax reduction over 9 years reaches 36,000 euros (12% of 300,000 euros), or 4,000 euros/year. The capped rent is 730 euros/month, or 8,760 euros/year. Annual charges (new-build co-ownership fees 1,800 euros, property tax 600 euros with partial exemption in the early years, insurance 200 euros, management 700 euros) total 3,300 euros. Net income from charges is 5,460 euros/year. Adding the 4,000 euro tax reduction, the total annual yield (net rent + tax advantage) is 9,460 euros for a total investment of approximately 555,000 euros (reduced notary fees for new-build at 2-3%).
The total yield reaches 1.70%/year. Without the tax advantage, it falls to 0.98%.
Now compare an investment in older property. The same budget of 408,000 euros (corresponding to a two-bedroom flat of 40 m² in the 11th at 10,200 euros/m²) plus 30,600 euros in notary fees gives a total investment of 438,600 euros. The property is rented furnished at 1,300 euros/month under a one-year lease, or 15,600 euros/year. Charges (co-ownership fees 1,600 euros, property tax 500 euros, landlord insurance 180 euros, maintenance 600 euros, management 1,248 euros, vacancy 433 euros) total 4,561 euros. Net income is 11,039 euros.
Under LMNP with the real regime, depreciation of the property (approximately 12,000 euros/year) and furniture (1,500 euros/year) fully neutralises the tax result for the first 8 to 10 years. The net-net yield is 2.52%, 48% more than Pinel, with an entry ticket 116,000 euros lower.
Over 9 years, the cumulative difference in net income is in the order of 40,000 to 50,000 euros in favour of older property under LMNP. And at resale, older property sells at market price, while Pinel property suffers a 15 to 25% discount compared to the new-build purchase price, since secondary market buyers know full well that the property was overpaid.
Discover how Home Select can support you
Committed Pinel investors: what to do now?
For owners who signed a Pinel before 31 December 2024, the commitment still runs. The tax reduction continues to apply for the chosen duration (6, 9 or 12 years). Breaking the commitment before the deadline triggers the recapture of all reductions received, a brutal tax bill that rarely makes early exit worthwhile, except in exceptional circumstances (international work transfer, divorce, prolonged job loss).
The strategic question concerns what happens after the commitment. Three options present themselves. The first is to keep the property and switch to standard rental without the Pinel cap, finally aligning the rent with market value: a significant catch-up (often +60 to +80% compared to Pinel rent). The second is to switch to furnished LMNP to benefit from depreciation on the residual value of the property: the most tax-advantageous solution. The third is to sell, factoring in the Pinel secondary market discount: two-bedroom flats purchased new for 540,000 euros in the 13th in 2022 struggle to sell above 400,000-430,000 euros in 2026, a capital loss of 110,000 to 140,000 euros that only part of the tax reduction offsets.
Alternatives to Pinel in 2026
The end of Pinel does not mean the end of property tax optimisation. Several schemes remain fully operational and, for Paris, some are far more relevant than Pinel ever was.
LMNP (Non-Professional Furnished Rental) is the most powerful scheme for the Parisian investor. Depreciation of the property (excluding land, over 25-30 years) and furniture (over 5-7 years) creates an accounting charge that absorbs rental income. No rent cap, no tenant income cap, no minimum commitment period, no geographic zone to comply with. LMNP offers the tax freedom that Pinel never gave.
The Malraux scheme is aimed at investors on a high marginal tax rate (41% or 45%) who have an appetite for heritage renovation. The tax reduction reaches 22% of restoration works in ZPPAUP areas and 30% in Conservation Areas. In Paris, conservation areas cover the Marais, part of the 5th and 6th arrondissements, and the Ile de la Cite. A renovation programme of 150,000 euros in the Marais generates a tax reduction of 45,000 euros spread over 4 years. The renovated property is rented at market rates and benefits from considerable renovation-driven appreciation: a double advantage that Pinel never offered.
The Denormandie scheme targets older properties with renovation work in so-called “city centre” areas. Paris is eligible in zone A bis. The principle is similar to Pinel (tax reduction according to commitment duration), applied to older property with a minimum of 25% of total cost allocated to works. This scheme remains marginal in Paris: finding properties requiring works representing 25% of total cost in a co-ownership that accepts them is a challenge.
The classic rental deficit allows renovation works to be deducted from overall income, up to a limit of 10,700 euros/year (temporarily raised to 21,400 euros for energy renovations). For an investor on a 41% marginal rate, each deductible euro of works saves 0.41 euros in tax: a powerful lever for purchases of flats needing renovation, one of the specialities of our property hunters.
Renovated older property: the post-Pinel winner
The analysis clearly reveals one winner for Paris: investment in older property to renovate, with an LMNP or rental deficit structure depending on the investor’s tax profile. Older property offers a purchase price 20 to 40% below new-build (8,000-11,000 euros/m² versus 12,000-15,000 euros/m²). Renovation works (1,000-1,500 euros/m² for a complete refresh, 2,000-3,000 euros/m² for a major renovation) create value while being tax-deductible. The renovated property is rented at market rates without caps, attracts higher-quality tenants, and resells without the new-build discount.
Our property hunters regularly identify properties with strong renovation potential in the 10th, 11th, 18th and 20th arrondissements: flats whose poor EPC rating leads to a 10 to 15% discount that renovation transforms into capital gain. Across 1,200+ mandates since 2011, the best-performing investments consistently combine a good purchase price, smart renovation work and an appropriate tax structure. Pinel never featured in that top list.
The trap of reflex tax relief
The disappearance of Pinel frees investors from a powerful cognitive bias: the obsession with tax reduction. How many French people bought a property they would never have bought without the tax incentive? How many paid 540,000 euros for a property worth 400,000 on the resale market?
Taxation is a parameter of the investment, not its objective. A good property investment in Paris rests on three pillars: a purchase price consistent with the market, a positive net rental yield, and medium-term capital gain potential. If taxation improves the equation, all the better. But it should never justify an excessive purchase price or mask an intrinsically mediocre yield.
This is the message we have carried since the creation of Home Select in 2011, and the end of Pinel makes it more audible than ever: invest in the quality of the property, not in the quality of the tax scheme.
Frequently asked questions
Can you still invest under the Pinel scheme in Paris in 2026?
No, the Pinel scheme ended on 31 December 2024 for new acquisitions. Investors who purchased before that date continue to benefit from the tax reduction for the duration of their commitment (6, 9 or 12 years).
What was the real yield of Pinel investments in Paris?
After analysing purchase prices for new-build properties (often 12,000-15,000 euros/m²), capped rents and taxation, the net yield from Pinel in Paris was between 1.5 and 2.5%, significantly lower than an investment in older property with a well-structured LMNP arrangement.
What are the alternatives to Pinel for tax relief in Paris in 2026?
The main alternatives are LMNP (depreciation of the property as furnished rental), the Malraux scheme (22-30% tax reduction for renovation in conservation areas), the Denormandie scheme (older properties with renovation work in high-demand areas), and the classic rental deficit for major renovation work.
Is LMNP more advantageous than Pinel in Paris?
Yes, in the vast majority of cases. LMNP in older property allows you to buy at a lower price (8,000-11,000 euros/m² versus 12,000-15,000 for new-build), set the rent freely, and neutralise taxation through depreciation. The net-net yield is 1 to 2 points higher.
